More's Case

Massachusetts Appeals Court

More's Case

323 N.E.2d 908, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 715, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 727

DecidedFebruary 28, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 323 N.E.2d 908 (More's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

More's Case, 323 N.E.2d 908, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 715, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 727 (Mass. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the evidence supported the finding of average weekly wage as defined by G. L. c. 152, § 1(1). We hold that there was no error in the decree entered in the Superior Court in accordance with the decision of the reviewing board. The amount of the average [716]*716weekly wage of an employee is a question of fact. Weir’s Case, 252 Mass. 236, 238 (1925). Testimony (including that of the claimant and fellow employee engaged in the same kind of work) supportive of the board’s finding of an average weekly wage of $125 (see Galloway’s Case, 354 Mass. 427, 431 [1968]; compare Morris’s Case, 354 Mass. 420, 425-426 [1968]) was admitted without objection before the single member. That evidence was relevant and had probative force. Laskowski v. Manning, 325 Mass. 393, 399 (1950). Where, as here, there was evidence which supported the board’s findings, such findings are final. Sabulis’s Case, 334 Mass. 709 (1956). Cummings's Case, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 849 (1974). The decree is affirmed. Costs of appeal are to be determined by a Justice of this court.

Raymond D. Ivaska for the insurer. Paul N. Gollub for the employee.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the evidence supported the finding of average weekly wage as defined by G. L. c. 152, § 1(1). We hold that there was no error in the decree entered in the Superior Court in accordance with the decision of the reviewing board. The amount of the average [716]*716weekly wage of an employee is a question of fact. Weir’s Case, 252 Mass. 236, 238 (1925). Testimony (including that of the claimant and fellow employee engaged in the same kind of work) supportive of the board’s finding of an average weekly wage of $125 (see Galloway’s Case, 354 Mass. 427, 431 [1968]; compare Morris’s Case, 354 Mass. 420, 425-426 [1968]) was admitted without objection before the single member. That evidence was relevant and had probative force. Laskowski v. Manning, 325 Mass. 393, 399 (1950). Where, as here, there was evidence which supported the board’s findings, such findings are final. Sabulis’s Case, 334 Mass. 709 (1956). Cummings's Case, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 849 (1974). The decree is affirmed. Costs of appeal are to be determined by a Justice of this court.

Raymond D. Ivaska for the insurer. Paul N. Gollub for the employee.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

323 N.E.2d 908, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 715, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mores-case-massappct-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack