Moreno v. Moreno
599 So. 2d 786, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272, 1992 WL 138801
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moreno v. Moreno. Read the opinion of the Court — 606 So. 2d 1280 →
Opinion
The appellee’s counsel by motion confessed error as to the first two points on appeal. We agree and reverse and remand this cause without further elaboration.
Inherently, our conclusion also requires a reversal of the contempt order which constitutes the third point on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moreno v. Moreno, 599 So. 2d 786, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7272, 1992 WL 138801 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 786 (Moreno v. Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.