Moreno (Rafael) Vs. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 12, 2021·No. 80513·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAFAEL MORENO, No. 80513 Appellant, VS. FILE BRIAN WILLIAMS, WARDEN, Respondent. FEB 1 2 2021 Ell7ABE11-1 A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

DEPLg'4

CTIEIT/

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge.

Appellant appeals from the district court's denial of his petition seeking sentence time credits. In response to an order of this court, the Attorney General advises that appellant has been released on parole. Thus, this appeal is moot. See Williains u. State, Dep't of Corr., 133 Nev. 594, 600 n.7, 402 P.3d 1260, 1265 n.7 (2017) (providing that when considering the computation of sentence credits that would make an inmate eligible for parole, "no relief can be afforded where the offender has already expired the sentence or appeared before the parole board on the sentence" (internal citation omitted)). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

Parraguirre Silver

cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge

OL13344

Rafael Moreno Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

9

(o) I947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moreno (Rafael) Vs. Warden, (Neb. 2021).

Moreno (Rafael) Vs. Warden (Moreno (Rafael) Vs. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.