Moreno (Quenit) Vs. Warden
This text of Moreno (Quenit) Vs. Warden (Moreno (Quenit) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
QUENIT MORENO, No. 80209 Appellant, vs. RENEE BAKER, WARDEN, FILED Respondent. jAN 2 3 202C ELI ROM CL OFvi.Ra4E COU ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court "order setting hearing on motion for reconsideration of order denying petition for writ of habeas corpus." Eleventh Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Jim C. Shirley, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
As,st,-0 Stiglich Silver
1Given this order, the pro se "motion to dismiss appeal or stay appeal until the hearing on the motion for reconsideration is resolved" is denied as moot.
je -0314(1 cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Quenit Moreno Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 19474 afilDr. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Moreno (Quenit) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moreno-quenit-vs-warden-nev-2020.