Moreno-Alvarez v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

Moreno-Alvarez v. Holder

413 F. App'x 962

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2011·No. 07-73642·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER

The panel amends the memorandum disposition filed on May 4, 2010 as follows: delete the concluding sentence that reads, “Accordingly the petition for review is hereby GRANTED” and insert the following, “Accordingly the petition for review is hereby GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED for any further proceedings consistent with this disposition.”

With that change, Judges Fernandez and Callahan vote to deny the Petition for Panel Pehearing and Judge Silverman votes to grant the petition. The Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The panel amends the memorandum disposition filed on May 4, 2010 as follows: delete the concluding sentence that reads, “Accordingly the petition for review is hereby GRANTED” and insert the following, “Accordingly the petition for review is hereby GRANTED, and the case is REMANDED for any further proceedings consistent with this disposition.”

With that change, Judges Fernandez and Callahan vote to deny the Petition for Panel Pehearing and Judge Silverman votes to grant the petition. The Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions will be entertained.

Moreno-Alvarez v. Holder, 413 F. App'x 962 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

413 F. App'x 962 (Moreno-Alvarez v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.