Moreman, Cassidy Scott
This text of Moreman, Cassidy Scott (Moreman, Cassidy Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE 156TH DISTRICT COURT
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three counts of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends that his plea bargain was not followed when drug free zone findings were entered on his judgment. Both the written plea agreement and the judgment states that part of the plea agreement was the State agreeing to dismiss the drug free zone allegations, but the judgment still shows that an affirmative drug free zone finding was made.
This finding appears to be a typographical error which needs to be corrected through a judgment nunc pro tunc and not a breach of Applicant's plea agreement as he alleges in his application. Applicant's request for relief is therefore denied.
Delivered: September 10, 2008
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Moreman, Cassidy Scott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moreman-cassidy-scott-texcrimapp-2008.