Morelos v. County of Stanislaus

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 16, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-01034·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEDIDIAH MORELOS, et al., ) Case No. 1:18-cv-01034-NONE-SAB ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT VOLUNTARY vs. ) DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF ) THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al. ) PROCEDURE ) Defendant(s). ) (ECF No. 70) ) Jedidiah Morelos (proceeding by his guardian ad litem), Nora Morelos, and Yakira Morelos filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 on August 1, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) At the time the complaint was filed, Jedidiah Morelos was seventeen years old. (Id.) He subsequently reached the age of majority and is now proceeding without a guardian ad litem. (ECF NO. 43.) On April 15, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this matter in its entirety with prejudice with each party to bears its own attorney fees and costs. (ECF No. 70.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. / / / / / / / / / WwAOe LYST MALS SEN RAVUUEEPOTI Po POI oe AY ev ! Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge to th case for the purpose of closing the case and then to adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal | ; this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. A (ee ©! Dated: _ April 15, 2020 OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morelos v. County of Stanislaus, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Morelos v. County of Stanislaus (Morelos v. County of Stanislaus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)