Morello v. Urraca
This text of 250 A.D.2d 656 (Morello v. Urraca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Marilyn Ur[657]*657raca appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated May 9, 1997, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
There is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D.2d 656, 671 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morello-v-urraca-nyappdiv-1998.