Morelli v. Battelli

386 N.E.2d 328, 68 Ill. App. 3d 410, 25 Ill. Dec. 57, 1979 Ill. App. LEXIS 2042
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 9, 1979
Docket78-822
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 386 N.E.2d 328 (Morelli v. Battelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morelli v. Battelli, 386 N.E.2d 328, 68 Ill. App. 3d 410, 25 Ill. Dec. 57, 1979 Ill. App. LEXIS 2042 (Ill. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE ST AMOS

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal arises from a proceeding to determine heirship, instituted by petitioner George Morelli. Pursuant to a hearing in the circuit court of Cook County, Probate Division, that court found that petitioner had not proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that he was the illegitimate son of decedent, Alphonse J. Battelli. It is from this finding that petitioner appeals.

Alphonse J. Battelli, decedent, died intestate May 24, 1976. On July 20, 1977, Violet Battelli, wife of deceased, filed a petition for issuance of letters of administration. This petition requested that she be named administrator of her husband’s estate. Letters of administration did issue to Violet Battelli.

On October 7, 1977, the circuit court entered an order declaring heirship. The order stated that the following five persons were heirs of decedent: (1) Violet Battelli, wife, (2) Sandra Palumbo, daughter, (3) Diane Susek, daughter, (4) Joseph Battelli, son and (5) Patricia Battelli, daughter.

On October 11, 1977, petitioner, George Morelli, filed a petition to amend heirship. Through this petition Morelli alleged (1) that decedent was petitioner’s natural father having fathered petitioner out of wedlock with petitioner’s mother, Patricia Walker, (2) that decedent had repeatedly acknowledged, both publicly and privately, that petitioner was his true and natural son born out of wedlock, and (3) that petitioner should be included in the table of heirship and receive a proportionate share of deceased’s assets.

On October 31,1977, in response to Morelli’s petition, Violet Battelli filed an answer to the petition to amend heirship. Battelli, through this petition, (1) demanded strict proof of petitioner’s allegations and (2) stated that in absence of said proof petitioner should be denied relief and the table of heirship confirmed as originally proven.

The circuit court commenced a hearing on heirship. The hearing, subsequently to be analyzed in detail, included the testimony of various witnesses including petitioner Morelli. The court also invited counsel to submit written briefs on this matter. Following the hearing, on February 23, 1978, the circuit court entered an order finding that petitioner Morelli had not proven by clear and convincing evidence that he is the illegitimate son of decedent, Alphonse J. Battelli. The petition to amend heirship was denied. It is from this order that petitioner appeals.

Prior to analyzing the testimony adduced in the hearing conducted by the circuit court we note that clear and convincing evidence is required to prove the paternity of Alphonse J. Battelli. In equating the requirement of clear and convincing evidence we have determined that such evidence is a quantum of proof which leaves no reasonable doubt in the mind of the trier of fact. In re Estate of Larimore (1978), 64 Ill. App. 3d 470, 381 N.E.2d 76.

Furthermore, we note that our scope of review is narrow in a case of this type. We cannot disturb the finding of the trial court unless such finding is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. In re Estate of Larimore (1978), 64 Ill. App. 3d 470, 381 N.E.2d 76; In re Estate of Conrad (1969), 117 Ill. App. 2d 29, 254 N.E.2d 123; In re Estate of Drisch (1969), 112 Ill. App. 2d 242, 250 N.E.2d 513.

Patricia Walker testified that she first met decedent in the late 1940’s. She indicated that their friendship grew and they eventually lived together as man and wife.

Walker discovered that she was pregnant in the fall of 1950. She testified that she and decedent planned to have a child and he was happy upon learning of her pregnancy. Decedent did, however, request that the child not be named Battelli. Decedent feared that news of the birth would find its way into a local newspaper. Walker testified that she complied with decedent’s request. The child, bom May 4, 1951, in Oak Park Hospital, was named George Morelli.

Walker further testified that decedent paid the hospital bill and purchased all the food and clothes for the child. She stated that she last saw decedent in 1975 at dinner with her sister and petitioner. Decedent paid for the dinner.

On cross-examination Walker noted that she was aware, prior to her pregnancy, that decedent was married. She also stated that she did not purposely become pregnant but both she and decedent desired a child. Walker testified that in the 9-month period preceding the child’s birth she had sexual intercourse with no person other than decedent. Finally, Walker indicated that she had no record of the clothing expenditures allegedly made by decedent.

Marie Agnes Fese testified that she was an acquaintance of Patricia Tetzloff (Walker). Fese testified that Walker was one of three women impregnated by decedent. Fese stated that the fathering of Walker’s child by decedent was common knowledge.

William Grundy, lieutenant of police for the city of Northlake, testified that he had known decedent for 18 years. Grundy stated that on an occasion when Grundy met George Morelli decedent referred to Morrelli as deceased’s son.

Lieutenant Faciano of the Northlake police testified that he knew Patricia Tetzloff (Walker) for more than 16 years. He stated that he met George Morelli when Morelli was 11 or 12 years of age. Faciano indicated that he learned that decedent and Walker were the child’s parents. Faciano also stated that decedent had referred to Morelli as deceased’s son.

Arthur Alexandria testified that he knew George Morelli since fifth or sixth grade. He stated that Morelli had also been known as “Rick,” “Ricko,” and “Red.” Alexandria stated that Morelli referred to decedent as Morelli’s father. Alexandria also attributed the following statement to decedent when decedent was speaking of Morelli: “My kid left his furniture in an apartment because he told me he didn’t have the money to rent a truck. My son has all the answers, doesn’t he?”

Thomas McClain testified that he knew George Morelli and was acquainted with decedent. McClain stated that upon decedent’s introduction to McClain’s mother as Morelli’s father, decedent “acknowledged” the introduction. McClain further testified that when decedent and Morelli visited McClain’s home Morelli introduced decedent as Morelli’s father.

George Morelli, petitioner in the case at bar, next testified. Morelli stated that he was bom May 4,1951, and that his parents were Alphonse Battelli and Patricia Tetzloff (Walker).

Morelli first remembered seeing decedent at Morelli’s sixth or seventh birthday party. At that time decedent allegedly gave Morelli a bicycle.

Morelli testified that he entered the service after leaving high school. He again saw decedent two or three months subsequent to his discharge from the service.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Sullivan
891 F.2d 185 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
Moore v. Goode
375 S.E.2d 549 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1988)
In Re Estate of Casey
507 N.E.2d 962 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1987)
Lukas v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
508 N.E.2d 368 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1987)
Allen v. Bowen
657 F. Supp. 148 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Severson
437 N.E.2d 430 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1982)
Kennedy v. Kennedy
416 N.E.2d 1188 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1981)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Johnson
415 N.E.2d 1131 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1980)
In Re Estate of Ragen
398 N.E.2d 198 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1979)
Ray-Chuen Chang v. Ragen
398 N.E.2d 198 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 N.E.2d 328, 68 Ill. App. 3d 410, 25 Ill. Dec. 57, 1979 Ill. App. LEXIS 2042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morelli-v-battelli-illappct-1979.