Morell v. Booth

29 So. 3d 429, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2864, 2010 WL 742595
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 2010
Docket5D09-3308
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 So. 3d 429 (Morell v. Booth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morell v. Booth, 29 So. 3d 429, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2864, 2010 WL 742595 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, a non-party to a dissolution proceeding, seeks review of an order compelling her to produce financial records and overruling her objection based on her constitutional right of privacy. We conclude that Respondent failed to show a compelling need for the records sufficient to defeat Petitioner’s privacy rights. We also conclude that the trial court erred by imposing sanctions against Petitioner, a non-party, absent a finding of contempt. The portion of the lower court’s order compelling the production of the records is quashed; the portion imposing sanctions is reversed. Price v. Hannahs, 954 So.2d 97 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.

GRIFFIN, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hutchinson v. Anderson
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Joseph v. State
29 So. 3d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 So. 3d 429, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2864, 2010 WL 742595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morell-v-booth-fladistctapp-2010.