Moreland v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Moreland v. United States

276 F. 640, 51 App. D.C. 118, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2132

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1921

DocketNo. 3662

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 F. 640 (Moreland v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moreland v. United States, 276 F. 640, 51 App. D.C. 118, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2132 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is a writ of error to the juvenile court of the District of Columbia and brings up for review a judgment in that court under which the plaintiff in error, without indictment or presentment by a grand jury, was sentenced to the workhouse at hard labor for six months, for willfully neglecting or refusing to provide for the support and maintenance of his minor children. See 34 Stat. 86. The single question necessary to be considered by us is whether the juvenile court has jurisdiction to impose a sentence involving hard labor where there has been no indictment or presentment by a grand jury, as provided by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.

In Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U. S. 228, 16 Sup. Ct. 977, 41 L. Ed. 140, Wing had been sentenced to the house of correction at hard labor for a period of 60 days, and the court expressly held that imprisonment at hard labor constituted an infamous punishment and that such' imprisonment could be imposed only where there had been a compliance with the Constitution. We see no escape from the conclusion that the decision in that case is controlling in this, and we therefore reverse the judgment and remand the case, with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is a writ of error to the juvenile court of the District of Columbia and brings up for review a judgment in that court under which the plaintiff in error, without indictment or presentment by a grand jury, was sentenced to the workhouse at hard labor for six months, for willfully neglecting or refusing to provide for the support and maintenance of his minor children. See 34 Stat. 86. The single question necessary to be considered by us is whether the juvenile court has jurisdiction to impose a sentence involving hard labor where there has been no indictment or presentment by a grand jury, as provided by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.

In Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U. S. 228, 16 Sup. Ct. 977, 41 L. Ed. 140, Wing had been sentenced to the house of correction at hard labor for a period of 60 days, and the court expressly held that imprisonment at hard labor constituted an infamous punishment and that such' imprisonment could be imposed only where there had been a compliance with the Constitution. We see no escape from the conclusion that the decision in that case is controlling in this, and we therefore reverse the judgment and remand the case, with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 F. 640, 51 App. D.C. 118, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moreland-v-united-states-cadc-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack