Moreland v. Stephens

64 Ga. 289
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 Ga. 289 (Moreland v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moreland v. Stephens, 64 Ga. 289 (Ga. 1879).

Opinion

Bleckley, Justice.

1. The remedy given by law to correct the error of a judge of the superior court “ in any matter heard at chambers,” is a bill of exceptions. Code, §42o 1. And a motion for a new trial is not appropriate. Lester vs. Johnson, this term.

2. In the present case, there was no writ of error directly upon the decision made by the judge at chambers disposing [290]*290of the money upon the rule against the sheriff; that decision was not excepted to and a bill of exceptions tendered and signed, but the dissatisfied party made a motion for a new trial, and the overruling of that motion is the subject matter of the writ of error now before us, and its only subject matter. No other error is assigned. IN ow, a motion for a new trial not being the remedy to reach any ei ror which the judge may have committed in his judgment disposing of the money, it is certain that the refusal to grant a new trial was not erroneous. This being a sufficient rea' son for the decision of the judge now under review, it is needless to look for any other.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Smith
136 S.E.2d 758 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Ballard v. Harmon
44 S.E.2d 260 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Crumbley v. Brook
70 S.E. 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Ga. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moreland-v-stephens-ga-1879.