Moreland v. State
This text of 67 S.E. 804 (Moreland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The discretion of the judge in refusing a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence will not be interfered with where there is no showing by affidavit or otherwise as to the character and credibility of the witness who, it is alleged, will testify to the newly discovered facts. Atwater v. Hannah, 116 Ga. 745 (42 S. E. 1007).
2. Nor is newly discovered evidence, the only purpose of which is to impeach the principal witness for the State, sufficient to require interference with the discretion of the court below in refusing a new trial. Herndon v. State, 75 Ga. 887.
3. Those portions of the court’s charge to the jury that were excepted to were not erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.
4. The evidence, together with such deductions therefrom as the jury were authorized to make, being sufficient to support the finding of the jury, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the court below in refusing a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.E. 804, 134 Ga. 268, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moreland-v-state-ga-1910.