Moreland v. State

963 So. 2d 949, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13828, 2007 WL 2481049
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moreland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2007·No. No. 4D07-2959·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Emmanuel Moreland appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his latest motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In Moreland v. State, 945 So.2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), this court affirmed the denial of his earlier rule [950]*9503.850 motion, without prejudice to his right to file a timely and verified motion alleging whether he actually qualified for youthful offender sentencing, and addressing the criteria under section 958.04(1), Florida Statutes, relating to ground eight of his motion. Instead of complying with this court’s mandate, appellant chose to file a new, successive motion alleging other grounds. The trial court did not err in summarily denying that motion, as it was clearly successive and unauthorized.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moreland v. State, 963 So. 2d 949, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13828, 2007 WL 2481049 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

963 So. 2d 949 (Moreland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moreland v. State
945 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)