Moreland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moreland v. State

570 So. 2d 445, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9120, 1990 WL 191886

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moreland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 552 So. 2d 937 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 1990·No. No. 89-0180·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Appellant filed a motion for relief in the trial court pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which was dismissed because of the pend-ency of this appeal. Our affirmance is without prejudice to the filing of a renewed motion in the trial court for appropriate relief. See Dickerson v. State, 509 So.2d 1390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Appellant filed a motion for relief in the trial court pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which was dismissed because of the pend-ency of this appeal. Our affirmance is without prejudice to the filing of a renewed motion in the trial court for appropriate relief. See Dickerson v. State, 509 So.2d 1390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Moreland v. State, 570 So. 2d 445, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9120, 1990 WL 191886 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

570 So. 2d 445 (Moreland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related