Moreland v. Snyder

459 So. 2d 1167, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16034
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 1984·No. No. 84-2096·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the conclusion that there was plainly no “manifest necessity” to justify the trial court’s sua sponte declaration of a mistrial after the jury had been sworn below, see Corneiro v. Solomon, 450 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. McNeil, 362 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978),1 we grant the defendant’s petition for prohibition to preclude his retrial in violation of his rights against double jeopardy.2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moreland v. Snyder, 459 So. 2d 1167, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16034 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

459 So. 2d 1167 (Moreland v. Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corneiro v. Solomon
450 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Edwards v. State
336 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
State v. McNeil
362 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)