Moreland v. Snyder

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moreland v. Snyder

459 So. 2d 1167, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16034

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 1984

DocketNo. 84-2096

StatusPublished

This text of 459 So. 2d 1167 (Moreland v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moreland v. Snyder, 459 So. 2d 1167, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16034 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the conclusion that there was plainly no “manifest necessity” to justify the trial court’s sua sponte declaration of a mistrial after the jury had been sworn below, see Corneiro v. Solomon, 450 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. McNeil, 362 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978),¹ we grant the defendant’s petition for prohibition to preclude his retrial in violation of his rights against double jeopardy.²

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the conclusion that there was plainly no “manifest necessity” to justify the trial court’s sua sponte declaration of a mistrial after the jury had been sworn below, see Corneiro v. Solomon, 450 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. McNeil, 362 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978),¹ we grant the defendant’s petition for prohibition to preclude his retrial in violation of his rights against double jeopardy.²

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

459 So. 2d 1167, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moreland-v-snyder-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack