Morel v. U.S. Parole Commission
This text of 478 F. App'x 765 (Morel v. U.S. Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Hector Morel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Morel v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 7:12-cv-00210-JLK (W.D.Va. May 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 F. App'x 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morel-v-us-parole-commission-ca4-2012.