Morel v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Morel v. O'Brien

393 F. App'x 108

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2010·No. No. 10-6556·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hector Morel, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morel v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00346-jlk-mfu, 2010 WL 1212573 (W.D.Va., Mar. 25, 2010). We deny Morel’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hector Morel, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morel v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00346-jlk-mfu, 2010 WL 1212573 (W.D.Va., Mar. 25, 2010). We deny Morel’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Morel v. O'Brien, 393 F. App'x 108 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

393 F. App'x 108 (Morel v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related