Morel v. Morel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Morel v. Morel

76 Pa. Super. 455, 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 167

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 18, 1921

DocketAppeal, No. 9

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 Pa. Super. 455 (Morel v. Morel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morel v. Morel, 76 Pa. Super. 455, 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 167 (Pa. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Though twelve assignments of error are filed, but two questions are presented: (1) Whether defendant occupied his sister’s land in circumstances requiring him to pay for use and occupation; and, (2) if so, how much? The parties agreed to refer the case under the local Act of April 6, 1869, P. L. 725, supplemented by the Act of June 22, 1871, P. L. 1363. The evidence discloses a dispute about the facts, and from it the referee concluded that a liability existed and fixed the amount at $720. There is evidence to sustain his conclusions. We need add nothing to what was said by the court below in dismissing exceptions to the referee’s findings by an opinion that will be printed with the report of this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Though twelve assignments of error are filed, but two questions are presented: (1) Whether defendant occupied his sister’s land in circumstances requiring him to pay for use and occupation; and, (2) if so, how much? The parties agreed to refer the case under the local Act of April 6, 1869, P. L. 725, supplemented by the Act of June 22, 1871, P. L. 1363. The evidence discloses a dispute about the facts, and from it the referee concluded that a liability existed and fixed the amount at $720. There is evidence to sustain his conclusions. We need add nothing to what was said by the court below in dismissing exceptions to the referee’s findings by an opinion that will be printed with the report of this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 Pa. Super. 455, 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morel-v-morel-pasuperct-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack