Morejon v. State

698 So. 2d 613, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9472, 1997 WL 484776
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 20, 1997
DocketNo. 96-720
StatusPublished

This text of 698 So. 2d 613 (Morejon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morejon v. State, 698 So. 2d 613, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9472, 1997 WL 484776 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Doctor v. State, 677 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring) (“[The instructions] if erroneous, were not harmfully so in the light of the complete, and completely accurate instructions repeatedly given the jury on the burden of proof issue, particularly at the most critical time immediately before its deliberations.”); Higginbotham v. State, 155 Fla. 274, 276-77, 19 So.2d 829, 830 (1944) (“[A] single instruction cannot be considered alone but must be considered in light of all other instructions bearing upon the same subject, and if, when so considered, the law appears to have been fairly presented to the jury, the assignment on the instruction must fail.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doctor v. State
677 So. 2d 1372 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Higginbotham v. State
19 So. 2d 829 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 So. 2d 613, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9472, 1997 WL 484776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morejon-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.