Moreira v. State

890 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 53, 2005 WL 26865
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 2005
DocketNo. 2D04-2462
StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 531 (Moreira v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moreira v. State, 890 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 53, 2005 WL 26865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

WALLACE, Judge.

Jimmy Moreira challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. He alleged that his designation as a sexual predator violated his right to due process because the statute under which he was so designated failed to provide procedural safeguards. For the reasons expressed in Anderson v. State, 886 So.2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), we affirm. As in Anderson, our affirmance is without prejudice to Moreira’s right to pursue any available civil remedies. See Angell v. State, 712 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. State
886 So. 2d 430 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Angell v. State
712 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 53, 2005 WL 26865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moreira-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.