Moreira v. State
890 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 53, 2005 WL 26865
Opinion
Jimmy Moreira challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. He alleged that his designation as a sexual predator violated his right to due process because the statute under which he was so designated failed to provide procedural safeguards. For the reasons expressed in Anderson v. State, 886 So.2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), we affirm. As in Anderson, our affirmance is without prejudice to Moreira’s right to pursue any available civil remedies. See Angell v. State, 712 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moreira v. State, 890 So. 2d 531, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 53, 2005 WL 26865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
890 So. 2d 531 (Moreira v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. State
886 So. 2d 430 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Angell v. State
712 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)