Morehead v. Striker

82 F. 1003, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2820

This text of 82 F. 1003 (Morehead v. Striker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morehead v. Striker, 82 F. 1003, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2820 (circtsdny 1897).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The various motions recently argued are disposed of as follows:

1. The present receiver, Mills W. Barse, having presented his resignation, will, upon filing the same, be relieved from further administration of .the trust; but ho will not be discharged until his accounts shall have been duly passed, ahd any sums therein with which he may be surcharged shall have been paid. Immediately upon the appointment of his successor, said Barse shall turn over to him all the assets, hooks, and papers of the receivership.

2. Upon signing the order accepting such resignation, the court will appoint a new receiver.

3. The motion to make Charles N. Haskell, C. H. Roser, and the Manhattan Trust Company parties to this action is denied. If, as is alleged, these individuals are indebted to the receivership, or hold assets to which it is entitled or in which it has an interest, the receiver may protect the interests of the trust sufliciently by bringing some appropriate suit.

4. The motion to make the American Surety Company, the bondsman of the present receiver, a party to this action, is also denied. The master, however, will notify that company that Mr. Barse’s accounts a.re now being investigated, and, should the company appear, will allow it to take part in the investigation. Motion to declare the bond forfeit is premature, and is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 F. 1003, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morehead-v-striker-circtsdny-1897.