Morehead v. McGibony

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Morehead v. McGibony

114 S.E. 912, 29 Ga. App. 265, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 228

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1922

Docket13799

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 912 (Morehead v. McGibony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morehead v. McGibony, 114 S.E. 912, 29 Ga. App. 265, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 228 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error being that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence, and this court being unable to say, from an examination of all the evidence in the case,’ that there was no evidence to support the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the verdict, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error being that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence, and this court being unable to say, from an examination of all the evidence in the case,’ that there was no evidence to support the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the verdict, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 S.E. 912, 29 Ga. App. 265, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morehead-v-mcgibony-gactapp-1922.