Moree v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Moree v. State

34 S.E. 327, 110 Ga. 256, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 504

DecidedOctober 27, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 34 S.E. 327 (Moree v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moree v. State, 34 S.E. 327, 110 Ga. 256, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 504 (Ga. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. Refusal by the court to permit a witness to answer a question is in no event cause for a new trial, when it does not appear what the expected answer would be. Huie v. McDaniel, 105 Ga. 319.

Argued October 5, Decided October 27, 1899.

Indictment for simple larceny. ■ Before Judge Spence. Worth superior court. April term, 1899.

Jesse W. Walters, for plaintiff in error. W. E. Wooten, solicitor-general, by Harrison & Bryan, contra.

2. Though the testimony was decidedly conflicting as to the identity of the property alleged to have been stolen, there was sufficient evidence to warrant a finding that it was the property described in the indictment, and was stolen by the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI