Moree v. Shiver

20 S.E.2d 185, 67 Ga. App. 366, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 419
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1942
Docket29386.
StatusPublished

This text of 20 S.E.2d 185 (Moree v. Shiver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moree v. Shiver, 20 S.E.2d 185, 67 Ga. App. 366, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 419 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinions

Gardner, J.

The plaintiff in error was sued as a joint tort-feasor with

Albany Coca-Cola Bottling Company. They filed separate bills of exceptions. The record reveals but one petition and one brief of evidence. What was said in the case of Albany Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Shiver, ante, 359, is controlling in this case for the reasons therein stated, as such reference in that opinion applies to plaintiff in error in this case. The judge did not e.r in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs, Broyles, G. J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albany Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Shiver
12 S.E.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Moree v. Shiver
12 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.E.2d 185, 67 Ga. App. 366, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moree-v-shiver-gactapp-1942.