Moree v. H. C. Bohack Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moree v. H. C. Bohack Co.

242 A.D. 799

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 799 (Moree v. H. C. Bohack Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moree v. H. C. Bohack Co., 242 A.D. 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by plaintiff Rose Moree to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when her heel caught in a hole in the floor of defendant’s store, causing hei to fall. Also action by her husband to recover for loss of services. Judgment for both plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, [800]*800Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., with whom Kapper, J., concurs, dissents and votes ior reversal upon the ground that the determination of the jury is against the weight of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by plaintiff Rose Moree to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when her heel caught in a hole in the floor of defendant’s store, causing hei to fall. Also action by her husband to recover for loss of services. Judgment for both plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, [800]*800Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., with whom Kapper, J., concurs, dissents and votes ior reversal upon the ground that the determination of the jury is against the weight of the evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moree-v-h-c-bohack-co-nyappdiv-1934.