Moreau v. Tonry

338 So. 2d 94, 1976 La. LEXIS 4992

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moreau v. Tonry. Read the opinion of the Court — 339 So. 2d 3 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 12, 1976·No. No. 58747·Published

Opinion

In re: Richard A. Tonry applying for motion to appoint a judge.

[95]*95STAY ORDER

On the showing that the trial judge re-cused himself, appointed another judge, who resumed the trial of the case in progress without having heard the evidence previously introduced:

All proceedings in this case are stayed until further orders of this court, and the respondent James Moreau is ordered to show cause, if he can or will, before 9:30 A.M., Wednesday, October 13th, why relief similar to that requested should not be afforded the relator Richard Tonry herein.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that there is no merit to this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Richard A. Tonry applying for motion to appoint a judge.

[95]*95STAY ORDER

On the showing that the trial judge re-cused himself, appointed another judge, who resumed the trial of the case in progress without having heard the evidence previously introduced:

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that there is no merit to this application.

Moreau v. Tonry, 338 So. 2d 94, 1976 La. LEXIS 4992 (La. 1976).

Pincite

338 So. 2d 94 (Moreau v. Tonry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.