More v. Ruggles
15 Wis. 275
Opinion
By the Court,
The only objections urged, go to tbe sufficiency of the proceedings for the purpose of enforcing a lien. But as no judgment was rendered for a lien, we do not see bow those objections are material. The fact of such insufficiency is no reason why tbe plaintiff may not take a personal judgment, if be establishes tbe right to one.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
More v. Ruggles, 15 Wis. 275 (Wis. 1862).
15 Wis. 275 (More v. Ruggles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mark Paine Lumber Co. v. Douglas County Improvement Co.
68 N.W. 1013 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)
Cox v. North Wisconsin Lumber Co.
51 N.W. 1130 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1892)
Smith v. Gill
35 N.W. 178 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1887)