More Co. v. Sunrise Air, Inc.

757 So. 2d 517, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 2000 WL 60220
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 26, 2000
DocketNo. 3D98-2496
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 757 So. 2d 517 (More Co. v. Sunrise Air, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
More Co. v. Sunrise Air, Inc., 757 So. 2d 517, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 2000 WL 60220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because ' Sunrise Air, Inc. filed suit against MORE Company, Inc. alleging breach of contract, the contract’s forum selectibn provision applies. The forum selection clause provides that any claims be brought in Nevada; therefore, Florida is not the proper forum for this suit. See Amedex Int’l Corp. v. Marino, 722 So.2d 836, 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (holding that claims against a foreign insurer “were properly dismissed under the policies’ forum selection clauses”). We reverse and direct the trial court to dismiss this action.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. State
757 So. 2d 517 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
757 So. 2d 517, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 2000 WL 60220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/more-co-v-sunrise-air-inc-fladistctapp-2000.