Moray v. DBAG, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moray v. DBAG, Inc.

28 A.D.3d 527, 812 N.Y.S.2d 362

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.3d 527 (Moray v. DBAG, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moray v. DBAG, Inc., 28 A.D.3d 527, 812 N.Y.S.2d 362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated October 20, 2004, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[528]*528In opposition to the defendant’s prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated October 20, 2004, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[528]*528In opposition to the defendant’s prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 527, 812 N.Y.S.2d 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moray-v-dbag-inc-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack