Moravsky v. Curran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moravsky v. Curran

12 A.D.2d 493, 209 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 493 (Moravsky v. Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moravsky v. Curran, 12 A.D.2d 493, 209 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the respondent City Manager of the City of Yonkers, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 10, 1959, dismissing his petition and the proceeding. Petitioner, a World War II veteran, alleges that he had been passed over or rejected for appointment to the position of Patrolman in the Bureau of Police in the City of Yonkers, even though : (a) his name appeared on the list of those eligible for such appointment; (b) he had successfully passed the competitive and other examinations; and (c) he had been certified as eligible and qualified by the respondent Municipal Civil Service Commission. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the respondent City Manager of the City of Yonkers, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 10, 1959, dismissing his petition and the proceeding. Petitioner, a World War II veteran, alleges that he had been passed over or rejected for appointment to the position of Patrolman in the Bureau of Police in the City of Yonkers, even though : (a) his name appeared on the list of those eligible for such appointment; (b) he had successfully passed the competitive and other examinations; and (c) he had been certified as eligible and qualified by the respondent Municipal Civil Service Commission. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 493, 209 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moravsky-v-curran-nyappdiv-1960.