Morash v. Minucci

299 A.D.2d 486, 749 N.Y.S.2d 889
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 299 A.D.2d 486 (Morash v. Minucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morash v. Minucci, 299 A.D.2d 486, 749 N.Y.S.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Croiter, R.), dated November 8, 2000, which granted the father’s application for unsupervised visitation with the child in Florida.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A noncustodial parent is entitled to meaningful visitation, and denial of that right is so drastic that it must be based on substantial evidence that visitation would be detrimental to [487]*487the welfare of the child (see Matter of Bradley v Wright, 260 AD2d 477; cf. Matter of MacEwen v MacEwen, 214 AD2d 572; Matter of Vanderhoff v Vanderhoff, 207 AD2d 494). Further, the determination of visitation is within the sound discretion of the hearing court based upon the best interests of the child (see Koppenhoefer v Koppenhoefer, 159 AD2d 113, 116), and its determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a substantial basis in the record (see Koppenhoefer v Koppenhoefer, supra). Here, the Referee’s determination to grant the father unsupervised visitation in Florida has such a substantial basis.

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivera v. Fowler
112 A.D.3d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Ross v. Ross
86 A.D.3d 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Janiyah T.
85 A.D.3d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Lane v. Lane
68 A.D.3d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Sinnott-Turner v. Kolba
60 A.D.3d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Chamberlain v. Chamberlain
24 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Graham v. White
16 A.D.3d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Martin v. Martin
15 A.D.3d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Anaya v. Hundley
12 A.D.3d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Jordan v. Jordan
8 A.D.3d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Grossman v. Grossman
5 A.D.3d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 A.D.2d 486, 749 N.Y.S.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morash-v-minucci-nyappdiv-2002.