Morano v. Commissioner
This text of 175 F.2d 555 (Morano v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole question involved in this case was whether a partnership which may be recognized for tax purposes under the rule laid down in Commissioner v. Tower, 1946, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, 90 L.Ed. 670, 164 A.L.R. 1135, Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 1946, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, 90 L.Ed. 679, and Commissioner v. Sunnen, 1948, 333 U.S. 591, 68 S.Ct. 715, 92 L.Ed. 898, existed between the petitioner, his wife and his two children in 1943 and 1944. The Tax Court stated that on the entire record it could not conclude that this family really and truly intended to join together as a partnership. We cannot say that this conclusion was clearly erroneous. Accordingly the decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 F.2d 555, 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 96, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morano-v-commissioner-ca3-1949.