Moran v. Vredenburgh

1 Hill & Den. 392
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hill & Den. 392 (Moran v. Vredenburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moran v. Vredenburgh, 1 Hill & Den. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

By the Court,

Beardsley, J.

The simple contract of the two joint debtors was extinguished by the bond, although given by one of them alone. This point is too well settled to admit of discussion. (Clement v. Brush, 3 Johns. Cas., 180

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robertson v. Smith
18 Johns. 459 (New York Supreme Court, 1821)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-vredenburgh-nysupct-1844.