Moran v. Vredenburgh
1 Hill & Den. 392
This text of 1 Hill & Den. 392 (Moran v. Vredenburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moran v. Vredenburgh, 1 Hill & Den. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).
Opinion
By the Court,
The simple contract of the two joint debtors was extinguished by the bond, although given by one of them alone. This point is too well settled to admit of discussion. (Clement v. Brush, 3 Johns. Cas., 180
New trial ordered.
See note to this case in second edition of Johns. Cas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Robertson v. Smith
18 Johns. 459 (New York Supreme Court, 1821)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-vredenburgh-nysupct-1844.