Moran v. Stalder
This text of 121 F.3d 210 (Moran v. Stalder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 96-30892 _______________________
JOHN A. MORAN,
Petitioner,
versus
RICHARD L. STALDER, SECRETARY LA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana _________________________________________________________________
August 19, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This is a successive habeas petition filed in the
district court in February 1996, before the effective date of the
Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. The district court
held, and we initially agreed, that because the petition was
pending at the effective date of the AEDPA, petitioner Moran was
required to obtain a certificate of appealability in this court
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. pursuant to newly enacted § 2244(b). As it turned out, the Supreme
Court did not agree with this position. Lindh v. Murphy, ___ S.Ct.
___ (1997), and it has held the COA requirement inapplicable to
petitions filed before the effective date of AEDPA. Consequently,
we must reverse and remand for consideration of Moran’s petition in
the district court pursuant to pre-AEDPA standards.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 F.3d 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-stalder-ca5-1997.