Moran v. Portland Steam Packet Co.

35 Me. 55
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1852·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Shepley, C. J.

— The general issue having been pleaded and joined, and the facts having been agreed, the other matter presented by brief statement became unimportant.

Reynolds and Wall, owners and bailors of part of the goods contained in the valise, had, before they were allowed to testify, released all their interest in those goods to the plaintiff ; and they were competent witnesses for him.

The plaintiff, as bailee of that portion of the goods originally owned by Reynolds and Wall, was entitled to maintain the suit for them and for his own goods. He is now entitled to recover for the value of all the goods lost, amounting to the sum of $52,00. Judgment for plaintiff for $52.

Wells, Tenney and Rice, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moran v. Portland Steam Packet Co., 35 Me. 55 (Me. 1852).

35 Me. 55 (Moran v. Portland Steam Packet Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
206 F. 190 (E.D. North Carolina, 1913)
Grinnell-Collins Co. v. Illinois Central Railroad
124 N.W. 377 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Partridge
58 Fla. 153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1909)
Withey v. Pere Marquette Railroad
104 N.W. 773 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
Carter v. Southern Railway Co.
50 L.R.A. 354 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Hardman v. Brett
37 F. 803 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1889)
Chamberlain v. West
33 N.W. 114 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1887)