Moran v. Plumb

Supreme Court of Florida

Moran v. Plumb

6 So. 2d 266, 149 Fla. 498, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 813

DecidedFebruary 10, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 6 So. 2d 266 (Moran v. Plumb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moran v. Plumb, 6 So. 2d 266, 149 Fla. 498, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 813 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant brought suit to cancel a contract for the purchase of certain lands in Palm Beach County and to foreclose a vendee’s lien. Fifteen questions are argued but the parties are widely at variance as to which are controlling. They all turn on the sufficiency of the amended bill of complaint to state a case in equity. Each question has been examined in the light of the record and we find no reversible error. To discuss them would require a long opinion that would serve no useful purpose.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant brought suit to cancel a contract for the purchase of certain lands in Palm Beach County and to foreclose a vendee’s lien. Fifteen questions are argued but the parties are widely at variance as to which are controlling. They all turn on the sufficiency of the amended bill of complaint to state a case in equity. Each question has been examined in the light of the record and we find no reversible error. To discuss them would require a long opinion that would serve no useful purpose.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 So. 2d 266, 149 Fla. 498, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-plumb-fla-1942.