Moran v. Moran

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moran v. Moran

634 So. 2d 275, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3039, 1994 WL 101283

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 1994

DocketNo. 93-0475

StatusPublished

This text of 634 So. 2d 275 (Moran v. Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moran v. Moran, 634 So. 2d 275, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3039, 1994 WL 101283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After the parties’ marriage was dissolved by final judgment, the trial court entered an order based on the parties’ post-judgment motions for contempt. We find that the trial court erred in redetermining the parties’ property rights post-judgment and in ordering former husband to reimburse former wife for items of personal property. Cohen v. Cohen, 613 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). The trial court, however, did not err in ordering former wife to reimburse former husband for fixtures and utility bills and to return personal items to former husband. Accordingly, we reverse only that portion of the order redetermining the property rights’ of the parties.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After the parties’ marriage was dissolved by final judgment, the trial court entered an order based on the parties’ post-judgment motions for contempt. We find that the trial court erred in redetermining the parties’ property rights post-judgment and in ordering former husband to reimburse former wife for items of personal property. Cohen v. Cohen, 613 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). The trial court, however, did not err in ordering former wife to reimburse former husband for fixtures and utility bills and to return personal items to former husband. Accordingly, we reverse only that portion of the order redetermining the property rights’ of the parties.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

634 So. 2d 275, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3039, 1994 WL 101283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-moran-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack