Moran v. Kelley
126 A. 924, 96 N.J. Eq. 699, 11 Stock. 699, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 407
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons-stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard,. Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd; White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark,. McGlbnnon, Kays—15.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moran v. Kelley, 126 A. 924, 96 N.J. Eq. 699, 11 Stock. 699, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 407 (N.J. 1924).
126 A. 924 (Moran v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gallagher v. Venturini
3 A.2d 157 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)