Moran v. Garland

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 12, 2023
Docket23-60190
StatusUnpublished

This text of Moran v. Garland (Moran v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moran v. Garland, (5th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

Case: 23-60190 Document: 00516998977 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60190 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ December 12, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Juan Moran, Clerk

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent. ______________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A091 602 986 ______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Juan Moran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from a decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his request for relief under former 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) and ordering him removed. He argues that his due process rights were infringed when the IJ denied his request to adduce new

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-60190 Document: 00516998977 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2023

No. 23-60190

evidence on remand and that the BIA acted contrary to its own caselaw by rejecting his argument challenging the IJ’s interpretation of the BIA’s earlier remand order. Because relief under former § 1182(c) was discretionary, Moran had no due process rights in connection with these proceedings. See Ramos-Portillo v. Barr, 919 F.3d 955, 962–63 (5th Cir. 2019). Moreover, the BIA did not err in rejecting Moran’s argument regarding the scope of its earlier remand order. See Bianco v. Holder, 624 F.3d 265, 273–74 (5th Cir. 2010). The petition for review is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bianco v. Holder
624 F.3d 265 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Jose Ramos-Portillo v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Ge
919 F.3d 955 (Fifth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moran v. Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-garland-ca5-2023.