Moran v. Fox

106 A. 37, 79 N.H. 523, 1918 N.H. LEXIS 47
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedNovember 6, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 A. 37 (Moran v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moran v. Fox, 106 A. 37, 79 N.H. 523, 1918 N.H. LEXIS 47 (N.H. 1918).

Opinion

Young, J.

The question raised by the defendant’s exception is not whether the remarks excepted to were prejudicial, as a matter of law, but whether there is any evidence to warrant the court’s finding that they rendered the trial unfair. Instead of there being no evidence to sustain the finding that they were prejudicial, that is the only conclusion of which the evidence is fairly capable. The question whether they produced the verdict is not now before this court, for the evidence relevant to that issue is not made a part of the case.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Smith
193 A. 224 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A. 37, 79 N.H. 523, 1918 N.H. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-fox-nh-1918.