Moran v. Erk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moran v. Erk

45 A.D.3d 1329, 844 N.Y.S.2d 806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 2007

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 A.D.3d 1329 (Moran v. Erk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moran v. Erk, 45 A.D.3d 1329, 844 N.Y.S.2d 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered July 20, 2006 in a breach of contract action. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiffs $234,065.75 against defendants.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Following a bench trial, Supreme Court awarded plaintiffs damages arising from defendants’ breach of a contract pursuant to which defendants had agreed to purchase plaintiffs’ residential property. Contrary to defendants’ contention, the evidence supports the court’s determination that defendants acted in bad faith by instructing their attorney to disapprove the contract, and thus “the condition that the contract be approved by [defendants’] attorney must be deemed waived and the contract formed” (McKenna v Case, 123 AD2d 517 [1986]). Contrary to defendants’ further contention, the court properly awarded statutory interest from the date of defendants’ breach of the contract (see City Univ. of N.Y. v Finalco, Inc., 129 AD2d 494, 496 [1987]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Gorski, Lunn, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered July 20, 2006 in a breach of contract action. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiffs $234,065.75 against defendants.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Following a bench trial, Supreme Court awarded plaintiffs damages arising from defendants’ breach of a contract pursuant to which defendants had agreed to purchase plaintiffs’ residential property. Contrary to defendants’ contention, the evidence supports the court’s determination that defendants acted in bad faith by instructing their attorney to disapprove the contract, and thus “the condition that the contract be approved by [defendants’] attorney must be deemed waived and the contract formed” (McKenna v Case, 123 AD2d 517 [1986]). Contrary to defendants’ further contention, the court properly awarded statutory interest from the date of defendants’ breach of the contract (see City Univ. of N.Y. v Finalco, Inc., 129 AD2d 494, 496 [1987]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Gorski, Lunn, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.3d 1329, 844 N.Y.S.2d 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-erk-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack