Moran v. Del Gaudio
This text of 202 Misc. 760 (Moran v. Del Gaudio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was error to charge that damages might be awarded for inconvenience, mental anguish, pain and suffering, as well as punitive damages. These elements of damage are not within the contemplation of section 1444-a of the Civil [761]*761Practice Act. Since the latter section creates a new statutory liability (David v. Fayman, 273 App. Div. 408, affd. 298 N. Y. 669), the same must be strictly construed (Leppard v. O’Brien, 225 App. Div. 162, 164, affd. 252 N. Y. 563).
The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to defendant to abide the event.
Fennelly, Hooley and Walsh, JJ., concur.
• Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 Misc. 760, 119 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-del-gaudio-nysupct-1952.