Moran v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.

746 S.W.2d 62, 295 Ark. 124, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 97
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 21, 1988
Docket88-24
StatusPublished

This text of 746 S.W.2d 62 (Moran v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moran v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc., 746 S.W.2d 62, 295 Ark. 124, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 97 (Ark. 1988).

Opinion

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s granting of the appellee’s motion for summary judgment dismissing one of the appellants’ causes of action, tort of bad faith, and their claim for punitive damages. We dismiss the appeal because there is no final appealable order.

The appellants’ suit against the appellee consisted of two causes of action: (1) breach of contract, and (2) bad faith failure to pay health insurance benefits. In their complaint, appellants prayed for $52,288.05 in damages for breach of contract plus interest and attorney’s fees and $2,550,000 in punitive damages for the tort of bad faith. The appellee moved for a partial summary judgment on the tort cause of action of bad faith failure to pay a claim. The trial court granted the partial summary judgment, finding that the appellee was a benevolent, nonprofit corporation and thus immune from tort liability. The trial judge, in dismissing the appellants’ tort claim, also dismissed their claim for punitive damages. In the judge’s letter to the attorneys, he stated, “this leaves us with the breach of contract claim, which will be tried if not settled.”

Because the appellants’ claim for breach of contract remains to be tried, there is no final appealable order in this case. See Ark. R. App. P. 2, see also Sevenprop Associates v. Harrison, 295 Ark. 35, 746 S.W.2d 51 (1988). Although the appellee failed to raise the issue of appealability in its brief, this court has held that such an issue is a jurisdictional one which we have the right and duty to raise on our own in order to avoid piecemeal appeals. Id. Accordingly, appellants’ appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sevenprop Associates v. Harrison
746 S.W.2d 51 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
746 S.W.2d 62, 295 Ark. 124, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moran-v-arkansas-blue-cross-blue-shield-inc-ark-1988.