Moralez v. State
This text of 167 Tex. Crim. 346 (Moralez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is operating a motor vehicle upon a public road while intoxicated; the punishment, seven days in jail and a fine of $100.
Motion to quash the array of jurors was filed, alleging that the members thereof had not been drawn and summoned in the manner required by Art. 2109 R.C.S.
A second motion to quash was filed alleging discrimination in the selection of the jury panel by the deliberate failure to include any of Mexican or Latin American extraction.
[347]*347Exception was reserved to the overruling of these motions.
In the absence of a formal bill of exception or a statement of facts adduced on the trial or upon the motion to quash, the correctness of the court’s ruling on the motions cannot be appraised. Fernandez v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 266, 254 S.W. 2d 1004.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 Tex. Crim. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moralez-v-state-texcrimapp-1959.