Morales v. Territory of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Morales v. Territory of Arizona

52 P. 1131, 6 Ariz. 184, 1898 Ariz. LEXIS 133

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 23, 1898

DocketCriminal No. 122

StatusPublished

This text of 52 P. 1131 (Morales v. Territory of Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morales v. Territory of Arizona, 52 P. 1131, 6 Ariz. 184, 1898 Ariz. LEXIS 133 (Ark. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

In the district court, the defendant, Anastacio Morales, was tried and convicted of the crime of' burglary. He appeals from the judgment rendered against him and fcom an-order refusing him a new trial. It is contended for reversal that the trial court erred in refusing instructions offered by the defendant; but an inspection of the record fails to- disclose what, if any, instructions were requested by the defendant, and an examination of all the instructions shown to have been given or refused satisfies us that the jury was properly charged as to the law of the case. We think the evidence fully supports the verdict, and find no error in any of the proceedings. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

In the district court, the defendant, Anastacio Morales, was tried and convicted of the crime of' burglary. He appeals from the judgment rendered against him and fcom an-order refusing him a new trial. It is contended for reversal that the trial court erred in refusing instructions offered by the defendant; but an inspection of the record fails to- disclose what, if any, instructions were requested by the defendant, and an examination of all the instructions shown to have been given or refused satisfies us that the jury was properly charged as to the law of the case. We think the evidence fully supports the verdict, and find no error in any of the proceedings. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 P. 1131, 6 Ariz. 184, 1898 Ariz. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-territory-of-arizona-ariz-1898.