Morales v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morales v. State

528 S.W.3d 41

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 6, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104364

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 S.W.3d 41 (Morales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morales v. State, 528 S.W.3d 41 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Ricardo Morales (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his post-conviction relief requesting the court to vacate, set aside, or correct his judgment and sentence. Movant was found guilty after a jury trial of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, four counts of statutory rape in the first degree, and three counts of statutory sodomy in the second degree; he was sentenced to a total of 45 years of imprisonment. This Court affirmed his convictions in State v. Morales, 412 S.W.3d 399 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished "with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Ricardo Morales (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his post-conviction relief requesting the court to vacate, set aside, or correct his judgment and sentence. Movant was found guilty after a jury trial of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, four counts of statutory rape in the first degree, and three counts of statutory sodomy in the second degree; he was sentenced to a total of 45 years of imprisonment. This Court affirmed his convictions in State v. Morales, 412 S.W.3d 399 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished "with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 S.W.3d 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-state-moctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack