Morales v. State

880 So. 2d 1289, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13423, 2004 WL 2003049
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morales v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 819 So. 2d 831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 2004·No. No. 3D04-1832·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Orlando Morales appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief wherein he alleges vindictive sentencing for failure to accept a plea offer.

This court has taken judicial notice of its file in Morales v. State, 869 So.2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). In that motion, the trial court denied, after an evidentiary hearing, the claim of defendant-appellant Morales that his trial counsel had been ineffective for advising him to reject the State’s plea offer. The sentencing transcript makes clear that the trial court’s sentencing decision was based on the testimony which came before the court at trial. The current postconviction motion was properly denied. See Wilson v. State, 845 So.2d 142 (Fla.2003).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. State, 880 So. 2d 1289, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13423, 2004 WL 2003049 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

880 So. 2d 1289 (Morales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
845 So. 2d 142 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)