Morales v. State

734 So. 2d 1098, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5100, 1999 WL 228584
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morales v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 731 So. 2d 91
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 1999·No. No. 97-00548·Published

Opinion

GREEN, Judge.

Jahdel Morales timely appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Morales raises two issues on appeal, one of which has merit. The written order addresses only the first ground regarding the plea agreement, which we affirm. In denying relief on grounds II through V, the written order does not have attached [1099]*1099to it any portion of the record and neither is the State’s response included.

We are aware that the State filed a response, attaching a deposition of one of the detectives, but did not indicate that the deposition was a part of the original record. As a result, the trial court granted an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether Morales was told of a plea offer and whether he rejected that offer. The court did not rule on allegations II through V of the motion before the hearing, nor did it address these allegations at the hearing.

We, therefore, affirm with respect to ground I and reverse with respect to grounds II through V, with directions that the trial judge comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(d).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

PARKER, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. State, 734 So. 2d 1098, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5100, 1999 WL 228584 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

734 So. 2d 1098 (Morales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.