Morales v. SAIF Corp.

103 P.3d 654, 196 Or. App. 693, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1686
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 29, 2004
Docket02-07850; A122935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 P.3d 654 (Morales v. SAIF Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morales v. SAIF Corp., 103 P.3d 654, 196 Or. App. 693, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1686 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

*695 LANDAU, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that, pursuant to ORS 656.325(5)(b), Bring Recycling (employer) was entitled to cease paying benefits for temporary total disability and begin paying benefits for temporary partial disability. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. In 1997, claimant suffered a shoulder injury at work, which employer accepted as non-disabling. Claimant returned to his job without time loss. In 1998, employer terminated claimant’s employment for a violation of work rules. Claimant began working for a different employer, Foss Furniture Clinic (Foss). Meanwhile, in 2000, employer implemented a written policy to assist workers to return to work after an injury by offering modified work.

In 2002, claimant’s shoulder condition became worse and he was unable to continue working at Foss. He has not returned to work since that time. In July 2002, employer accepted an aggravation claim relating to the shoulder injury and reclassified the original claim as disabling. Employer began paying benefits for temporary total disability as of September 19, 2002. Claimant had surgery on his shoulder on September 23, 2002, and his attending physician released him for modified work on September 30, 2002. On October 9, 2002, the attending physician approved a modified job that employer would have offered to claimant as of October 14, 2002, had he remained employed. In response to the physician’s release, employer ceased payment of temporary total disability as of October 14. The board upheld employer’s termination of benefits, and claimant seeks judicial review. The only question on review is whether employer was authorized to cease paying temporary total disability benefits. We begin our analysis with a review of the general provisions relating to temporary disability.

A nondisabling injury is an injury that requires medical services only. ORS 656.005(7)(d). A disabling injury is one that entitles a worker to compensation for disability. ORS 656.005(7)(c). An injury that is initially nondisabling may be reclassified as disabling through the filing of an aggravation claim, ORS 656.277(2), as occurred in this case. *696 When a claim is reclassified as disabling, benefits for temporary disability become available. ORS 656.210 is the general provision relating to benefits for temporary total disability. It provides that,

“[w]hen the total disability is only temporary, the worker shall receive during the period of that total disability compensation equal to 66-2/3 percent of wages * *

There are times when, as here, a worker’s nondisabling injury becomes temporarily disabling after the worker has left the employer-at-injury. If the worker remains in the workforce, the worker is nonetheless entitled to benefits for temporary disability. See ORS 656.262(4)(a) (setting forth requirement for payment of temporary disability compensation); ORS 656.005(30) (“worker” does not include a person who has withdrawn from the workforce during the period for which benefits are sought); OAR 436-030-0020; RSG Forest Products v. Jensen, 127 Or App 247, 250, 873 P2d 324 (1994). Temporary total disability benefits are available for aggravation claims. ORS 656.273(6) (a claim for aggravation is to be processed in accordance with the provisions of ORS 656.262). It is undisputed that, although claimant had been discharged from his employment with employer, when his condition became disabling while he was working for Foss he was entitled to and received benefits for temporary total disability.

Under ORS 656.268(4), benefits for temporary total disability generally continue until:

“(a) The worker returns to regular or modified employment;
“(b) The attending physician advises the worker and documents in writing that the worker is released to return to regular employment;
“(c) The attending physician advises the worker and documents in writing that the worker is released to return to modified employment, such employment is offered in writing to the worker and the worker fails to begin such employment. * * *
*697 “(d) Any other event that causes temporary disability benefits to be lawfully suspended, withheld or terminated under ORS 656.262(4) or other provisions of this chapter.”

ORS 656.268 applies to aggravation claims. See Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply, 336 Or 349, 372, 84 P3d 119 (2004); Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385, rev dismissed, 329 Or 503 (1999).

When a worker is no longer totally disabled, ORS 656.212 provides authorization for a reduction in temporary disability benefits:

“When the disability is or becomes partial only and is temporary in character:
% * * ❖
“(2) The payment of temporary total disability pursuant to ORS 656.210 shall cease and the worker shall receive that proportion of the payments provided for temporary total disability which the loss of wages bears to the wage used to calculate temporary total disability pursuant to ORS 656.210.”

Thus, as a general rule, when a worker’s temporary disability becomes partial in character and the worker returns to wage earning employment, the worker’s entitlement to temporary total disability under ORS 656.210

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SAIF Corp. v. ILIAIFAR
174 P.3d 1055 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Morales v. SAIF Corp.
124 P.3d 1233 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 P.3d 654, 196 Or. App. 693, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-saif-corp-orctapp-2004.